English / Español

.For better or worse, SpaceProjects.com is a completely free watchdog service which has never
accepted any sponsorship (sort of like Consumer Reports).  Why might this matter?  Here's our answer.

.

.

.

     What is preventing NASA from offering (and the pork-loving Congress from approving) actually adequate space-related competitive prizes for the private sector?  Do taxpayers not deserve for there to be an efficiency-rewarding means of procurement that replaces NASA's parasitic central planning?  Don't cost-reducing space entrepreneurs like Burt Rutan deserve for NASA to finally grant their wish? 

       Should NASA's complex & murderous Space Shuttle have continued to have a $600 million-per-flight monopoly regarding sending people into space from the USA?  Did you know that the Russian Soyuz, and arguably some privately owned American competitors which NASA jealously thwarted, prove that potentially entrepreneurially-developed alternatives can achieve basically the same task much more safely for 30 times less money?  Details...

Has NASA been stifling commercial space ventures that could otherwise outperform it?

.

Which proposed legal reforms could best help our stagnating aerospace industry?

Will campaign finance reform endeavors, which greatly restrict
corporations' and labor unions' donations to political parties, reduce
NASA's wasteful pork barrel spending?

     Does your favorite "news" source regarding space disclose how much sponsorship it regularly receives from tax-subsidized, bloated and monopolistic U.S. aerospace contractors which profit from preserving the ailing status quo?  Maybe that's why you're not being told that NASA has a bigger budget than all the rest of the world's civilian space agencies combined?  

    Isn't it remarkable how NASA pretends to offer certain ethnic minorities (but not others) a racial spoils system of government contracting preferences in exchange for their political support,  while nevertheless sneakily keeping them down & dependent on the bureaucratic & parasitic central planners'  "NASA plantation"?   Have you noticed how little NASA traditionally tells them of its competitive prizes?  Notice its absence here, for example?

     Do you know why it is still practically impossible to fire NASA bureaucrats, no matter how corruptly, lazily or arrogantly such typically overpaid folks behave with taxpayers' hard-earned money?   To learn what former President Bush tried doing to finally reform their antiquated civil service labor protections, please click here.

Would you like to see at least some of the political campaign "donations" that the entrepreneurship-stifling companies and labor unions that you distrust the most recently made?   One can search for information about donors and their "gifts"  here.

.

      Did NASA pay $2.3 million dollars for loyalty from Prospace, the supposed "Citizen's Space Lobby," while taxpayers continue getting ripped off?    Will ProSpace be engaging in its usual government contract-seeking, deceptively secretive shenanigans in the wake of its latest "March Storm" charade conducted at volunteers' and congressional staffers' expense?  For an analysis of what ProSpace typically does, please click here.  Meanwhile, here's an analysis of the parasitic corruption that plagues nearly all U.S. space lobbies.

.

      Have we uncovered significant corruption involving NASA and (the supposedly objective "watchdog") NASAWatch.COM regarding (among other things) their extensive collusion at Devon Island, Canada?