Space port tax incentives or spaceport gifts: which approach is better?
The USA already has
spaceports in a few different states.
Other states are now exploring the possibilities. To learn about the new
Spaceport Equality Act
tax incentive, please click
here.
Reading between the line$ a
bit, are the various spaceport authority representatives linked below
investing more energy and money trying to get that
spaceport tax incentive through
Congress than they are in trying to attract taxpayers' handouts from federal
and local governments? If not then are their long term
business plans really as sound as they might
claim to believe that they are? Or could it be true that they
are really just hoping to set up highly redundant "federal trough-feeding
operations" at taxpayers' expense while merely
pretending to be useful, like some critics
allege?
The spaceport enthusiasts' goals seem rather intriguing
on paper at least, but are they genuinely pressing for any sufficiently
significant, status quo-changing and pro-entrepreneurial reforms within
the same government from which they simultaneously seek tax-subsidized handouts?
Or might there be a conflict of interest between asking for
an entrepreneurially friendly streamlined government while nevertheless asking
for monetary favor$ from its
self-perpetuating
bureaucrats? For example, what did the spaceport enthusiasts do
to oppose the wasteful and much maligned
X-33 Shuttle replacement fiasco,
which practically nobody else vocally or even tacitly supported except for
some dependent government bureaucrats and a very small handful of anointed
contractors? Both the X-33 and the spaceport movement are criticized
as depending almost completely upon wasteful governmental
pork barrel spending.
Is this merely a coincidence?
Please feel free to let
us know what you decide after candidly asking these subsidy-seekers
(and their elected congressional
representatives) for a sincere response in our
democracy. We do not condemn their supposed goals of
self-fulfillment, but like a growing quantity of skeptics we find their coziness
with the stagnating status quo to be increasingly puzzling. This is
especially the case considering our country's growing
national debt and also their claims that a commercial space
transportation industry really could profit from what they want to offer
(even as they strive apparently far less for
tax incentives than they do
for government handouts). Hopefully their actions will someday silence
their entrepreneurial critics?
Here are most, if not all of the known spaceport websites:
Here´s a
list of other
spaceports´ contact information, from either the USA or abroad.
.
We post spaceport websites here for free.
Please let us know which others
we should include here.
According
to a Washington Times
article,
retiring Texas Senator Phil Gramm seemed
to care much more about permanently repealing the estate tax (which
only applies to less than 2% of estates anyway) than about
finally getting tax free
treatment for the
spaceports that were
being proposed for his state. Whatever happened to "Texans first,"
Phil?
.